The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Admir Skodo received a research grant

SASNET researcher Admir Skodo has received a grant from Magnus Bergvall's Foundation for his research on Afghan refugees and asylum seekers in the United States and Sweden. The grant is in the amount of 30,000 SEK and is to be used for field research in the Afghan community in New York.

The project titel is "Restricting, Admitting, and Deporting Afghan Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Sweden and the United States during the Cold War, the War on Terror, and the 2015 “Refugee Crisis” The project

Admir Skodo
examines how Afghan refugeehood and asylumhood in Sweden and the United States has been viewed within and contested and negotiated between state agencies, voluntary organizations, NGOs, international organizations, immigration lawyers, and by Afghans themselves in three contexts: the Cold War, the War on Terror, and the 2015 “refugee crisis”. It traces the changing patterns of Afghan asylum applications, refugee quotas, imposed restrictions, deportations, and theories justifying admission, restriction or deportation. The United States and Sweden are chosen for two reasons: First, because they are both major receiving countries when it comes to refugees and asylum seekers, and Afghans have been seeking refuge in both since the 1980s. Second, they are countries with different immigrant cultures and legal systems, and so offer a good contrast for examining how these differences impact the same national group of asylum seekers and refugees. The project challenges three widely held theses in the literature on the forced migration of Afghans. First, that Afghan refugees and asylum seekers were generally accepted as anti-communist freedom fighters during the 1980s, while being met with distrust following 9/11. Second, that restrictionist measures are dependent on large numbers of asylum seekers. And third, that there is always a link between the foreign policy preferences of a state and the groups which it favors in refugee and asylum seeker admissions.